Free LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning Exam Questions and Answers
Part of LSAT (Law School Admission Test) — see every part of the exam.
LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning is one of the Test Prep tests covered here. These are standardised tests from different organisations rather than one programme — the Praxis series for US teacher licensure is awarded by ETS, and admissions and licensure tests alongside it come from other bodies entirely, each with its own format and scoring.
Looking for LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning exam dumps or ExamTopics questions? These practice questions cover the same ground with verified answers and explanations, a downloadable PDF and a full practice test, kept current as Test Prep updates the exam.
Last updated: October 25, 2026
- Provider
- Test Prep
- Questions in our bank
- 1000+
- Free to read
- First 10, with answers
- Our test mode duration & pass mark
- 130 mins · 70%
- Verified answers
- Reviewed weekly
- Practice format
- Multiple choice
Recommended: Switch to Test Mode to start a practice test that simulates the real exam experience.
Question #1
Critic: Many people insist that a film adaptation of a novel is always inferior to the novel. This view rests on judging the two by the same standard, but they are different art forms. A novel can spend hundreds of pages on a character's inner thoughts, whereas a film must convey a story in about two hours, mostly through what can be seen and heard. Thus, the common complaint about adaptations reflects a mistaken standard of comparison rather than a real shortcoming of films. The claim that a film must convey a story in about two hours, mostly through what can be seen and heard, figures in the critic's argument as
Correct answer: A
Explanation
The critic's main conclusion is the last sentence. The claim about the film's constraints supports the intermediate claim that novels and films are different forms that should not be held to one standard, and that intermediate claim in turn supports the conclusion. The tempting wrong choice treats the claim as a shortcoming of films, but the critic presents it as a feature of the form, not a defect.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #2
Any restaurant that earns a top rating from the health inspectors has a spotless kitchen. The Harbor Grill has a spotless kitchen. Therefore, the Harbor Grill must have earned a top rating from the health inspectors. The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?
Correct answer: B
Explanation
The stimulus reasons that because the condition required for a top rating is present, the rating must be present. That is, it mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient one. The bar-examination argument has exactly that form. The ticket argument is also flawed, but it reasons from the absence of the sufficient condition to the absence of the necessary one, a different error. The climber and pipe arguments are valid.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #3
The leak in the roof must come from the flashing, the skylight seal, or a cracked tile. The inspectors found the flashing intact and the skylight seal watertight. Therefore, the leak must come from a cracked tile. The pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most closely paralleled in which one of the following?
Correct answer: E
Explanation
The stimulus lists three possible sources, rules out two of them, and concludes the third. The missing-file argument does exactly that. The power-failure argument rules out only one of three possibilities, so its conclusion does not follow. The others use a chain of comparisons, a conditional, and a flawed reversal of a statement about a group.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #4
Researchers tracked 600 office workers for a year. The workers who commuted by bicycle took, on average, fewer sick days than the workers who drove or used public transit. The cyclists were also, on average, younger than the other workers, and previous research has shown that, among adults, the number of sick days taken per year tends to rise with age. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
Correct answer: E
Explanation
Because the cyclists were younger and sick days rise with age, age could account for some of the observed difference. That cautious claim is all the passage supports. The claims that cycling reduces sick days, that cyclists fare better at equal ages, or that age is the only factor all go beyond the information given, and nothing compares transit users with drivers.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #5
Ruth: The city should not spend public money on a new stadium. Studies of other cities show that stadiums rarely generate the tax revenue that supporters promise. Kwame: Supporters' revenue forecasts are indeed often inflated. But revenue is the wrong test. A stadium is a public amenity, like a library, and nobody expects a library to turn a profit. The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Ruth and Kwame agree that
Correct answer: E
Explanation
Ruth says stadiums rarely generate the revenue supporters promise, and Kwame says supporters' forecasts are often inflated, so both accept that such forecasts tend to be overstated. The library comparison is Kwame's alone, and the two clearly differ on whether the city should build the stadium and on whether profit matters. Ruth's claim is that stadiums rarely meet the forecasts, not that they generate nothing.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #6
Museum director: The tidal-energy exhibit will cost no more than $150,000 to build. Any exhibit that includes interactive displays costs more than $200,000 to build. Therefore, the exhibit will not attract many school groups. Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the museum director's conclusion to be properly drawn?
Correct answer: E
Explanation
The premises establish that the exhibit will have no interactive displays. To reach the conclusion, one must add that attracting school groups requires interactive displays. The assumption that interactive exhibits mostly succeed runs the connection in the wrong direction, and the others do not link a lack of interactive displays to a lack of school groups.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #7
Principle: A professional who stands to profit from a client's decision should tell the client about that financial interest before giving advice on the decision, unless the client already knows of it. Which one of the following judgments most closely conforms to the principle above?
Correct answer: C
Explanation
The accountant stood to profit from the client's decision and disclosed only after the advice was acted on, so she did not disclose before giving advice, as the principle requires. The mechanic has no financial interest, the planner's client already knew, and the architect did disclose in time, so each of those judgments conflicts with the principle. The attorney's good results do not excuse the missing disclosure.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #8
Economist: Last year the town of Alder Falls eliminated its parking fees downtown, and over the following twelve months the number of new businesses opening downtown doubled. Clearly, free parking attracts new businesses. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?
Correct answer: C
Explanation
The economist infers causation from timing. If a large employer arrived downtown and most new businesses opened to serve its workers, there is an alternative explanation for the increase, so the link to free parking is undermined. The neighboring-towns option is tempting but, if anything, mildly supports the claim that fee-free parking helped.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #9
Every applicant to the apprenticeship program who had prior welding experience was interviewed. Only applicants who were interviewed were offered a place in the program. Some applicants who were offered a place had no prior welding experience. Which one of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?
Correct answer: A
Explanation
Anyone offered a place must have been interviewed, so the applicants offered a place without welding experience were interviewed. That makes some interviewed applicants inexperienced. The passage says nothing about whether every interviewee got an offer, how experienced applicants fared, or how many offers were made.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Question #10
Renata: The public pool on Calder Street is rarely more than a quarter full on weekday mornings. The city should therefore stop opening it then and spend the savings on longer weekend hours. Deshawn: But the people who swim on weekday mornings, mostly retirees and parents of infants, have no other time to swim. Low attendance alone is no reason to close the pool during those hours. Renata and Deshawn disagree over whether
Correct answer: E
Explanation
Renata treats low attendance as enough to justify closing those hours, and Deshawn explicitly denies that. Deshawn never disputes the attendance figure, and neither speaker takes a position on weekend demand or on who the weekday swimmers are in a way that conflicts with the other.
Continue with LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning
Unlock the full question bank
You have read the first 10 questions. A subscription opens every question in LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning, the full timed practice test, and your progress and weak-topic reporting.
Single exam
$19.99for 30 days
Full question bank and practice test for one exam, for 30 days.
Single exam
$49.99for 1 year
One exam for a full year. Nothing renews and nothing to cancel.
Full access
$39.99/mo
Every exam in the catalogue, month to month.
Full access
$199.99/yr
Every exam in the catalogue for a year.
Already subscribed? Sign in to pick up where you left off.
Discussion
Explain your reasoning, not just the letterOther Test Prep certifications
- GRE Section 1 Verbal: Section One Verbal (opens in a new tab)
- PRAXIS Mathematics Section: Pre-Professional Skills Test (PPST) - Mathematics Section (opens in a new tab)
- GED Section 5 Mathematics: Section Five Mathematics (opens in a new tab)
- TEAS Section 3 Math Problem Solving: Test of Essential Academic Skills - Math Problem Solving (opens in a new tab)
- GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability (opens in a new tab)
- TEAS Section 1 Reading Comprehension: Test of Essential Academic Skills - Reading Comprehension (opens in a new tab)
- GRE Section 2 Quantitative: Section Two Quantitative (opens in a new tab)
- PRAXIS Reading Section: Pre-Professional Skills Test (PPST) - Reading Section (opens in a new tab)
- GMAT Test: Graduate Management Admission Test: Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA), Quantitative section, Verbal section (opens in a new tab)
- ACLS: Advanced Cardiac Life Support (opens in a new tab)
- HESI A2: HESI Admission Assessment Exam (A2) (opens in a new tab)
- NAPLEX: North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (opens in a new tab)
Reviews
Write a review★★★★★
Exam Practice is worth every penny. The mock exams are realistic, and the feedback helped me focus on key areas.
Amit SharmaVerified buyer
★★★★★
I highly recommend Exam Practice. The feedback after each test helped me improve significantly, and I passed my exams easily.
Oscar NyströmVerified buyer
★★★★★
This platform is a lifesaver. The practice questions and explanations are so detailed. It’s the best study tool I’ve ever used.
Hannah SmithVerified buyer
FAQ
- Q1: What is the LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning exam?
- A: LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning is a Test Prep certification exam. Judging by the questions in our bank, it concentrates on assumption, flaw, conclusion, claims and improves.
- Q2: What topics does the LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning exam cover?
- A: Questions in our LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning bank cluster around assumption, flaw, conclusion, claims, improves, dogs, study and flawed. Working through the full set is the quickest way to find which of these you are weakest on.
- Q3: How should I prepare for LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning?
- A: Work through the LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning practice questions here, checking your answer on each one, then sit the practice test to rehearse the exam under timed conditions before the real thing.
- Q4: Are these real LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning exam questions?
- A: They are drawn from officially released past questions and from community members who have sat LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning. Answers are verified and updated weekly.
- Q5: Where do I register for the LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning exam?
- A: Register through Test Prep directly. Exampractice is not affiliated with Test Prep and does not administer the exam.
- Q6: Is there a free LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning sample?
- A: Yes. Every LSAT Section 1 Logical Reasoning: Section One Logical Reasoning page shows a free sample of real questions. Upgrading opens the full bank and the practice test.



